After Meta laid off 3,600 of its "lowest performers" on February 10, some say they had good performance reviews, and experts say the label is highly subjective (Beatrice Nolan/Fortune)

Beatrice Nolan / Fortune: After Meta laid off 3,600 of its “lowest performers” on February 10, some say they had good performance reviews, and experts say the label is highly subjective  —  - Meta said it was cutting low performers in its most recent round of cuts.  However, some staffers and experts have questioned the company's methods.

Feb 13, 2025 - 19:47
 0
After Meta laid off 3,600 of its "lowest performers" on February 10, some say they had good performance reviews, and experts say the label is highly subjective (Beatrice Nolan/Fortune)

Beatrice Nolan / Fortune:
After Meta laid off 3,600 of its “lowest performers” on February 10, some say they had good performance reviews, and experts say the label is highly subjective  —  - Meta said it was cutting low performers in its most recent round of cuts.  However, some staffers and experts have questioned the company's methods.